Selected completed dialogues and efforts:
Dialogue on consideration of biodiversity in connection with renewable energy projects:
Within the unlisted investment area, PFA has initiated discussions with managers of our infrastructure investments regarding the integration of biodiversity considerations in the development and operation of wind power and solar parks. In 2023, PFA engaged in dialogue with European Energy and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners, and in 2024 PFA initiated discussions with Ørsted in its role as infrastructure manager. Renewable energy is essential for the green transition, but must be developed with due consideration for nature.
Dialogue on global plastic pollution:
PFA has prioritized engaging in dialogue with Nestlé, Unilever and Colgate-Palmolive regarding their impact on, and management of, global plastic pollution in their value chains – an area that illustrates the link between limited circularity and the loss of biodiversity and ecosystems.
All three companies are actively working to reduce the use of virgin plastic and to ensure that the packaging of their products can be recycled, including by setting targets in line with the Ellen MacArthur Foundation framework. At the same time, further action is needed from companies, the public sector and consumers to ensure that plastic does not end up in nature. PFA expects that conditions for further progress will improve if the UN adopts a legally binding global treaty on plastic pollution in 2025.
Thematic dialogue on human rights:
PFA takes a strong stance against human rights violations and has sought to strengthen practices in this area within the mining, electronics and cocoa sectors through the thematic engagement programme Human Rights Accelerator.
This work has been carried out in collaboration with investors in the Nordic Engagement Cooperation (including investors from Sweden, Norway and Finland), as well as PFA’s external advisor and other like-minded investors. The programme was completed in the first half of 2025 and involved dialogue with just over 20 companies aimed at strengthening their implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs).
Since these dialogues began in 2022, progress has been made in several areas such as the integration of human rights into companies’ due diligence practices, grievance mechanisms and corporate governance (including board oversight and the integration of human rights into executive remuneration).
Dialogues with mining companies about work culture:
In 2022, PFA engaged in dialogue with, and sent investor letters to, selected mining and metals companies based on a report about work culture at Rio Tinto. At Rio Tinto’s own initiative, the report was prepared by Elizabeth Broderick & Co as an external assessment of the company’s work culture. The report identified a number of serious issues, including discrimination, bullying and harassment.
Following publication of the report, PFA contacted Rio Tinto directly and held a meeting with the company, where the report and its proposals for cultural change were reviewed and discussed. We also contacted our external advisor, Sustainalytics, to obtain their assessment of the matter.
As the issue is not limited to Rio Tinto, we also chose to reach out to other mining and metals companies in which we are invested, with a view to improving the monitoring and handling of work culture across the sector. In total, PFA contacted ten companies, including sending letters to five and engaging in dialogue with five.
With regard to Rio Tinto, we recognise that the company has prioritised the issue and initiated action, including commissioning and publishing the report itself. The implementation of the measures proposed in the report was evaluated in 2024. PFA has remained in direct contact with the company, and almost all measures have been implemented as planned. At the same time, the company acknowledges that changes in work culture require ongoing effort, which is why cases of discrimination, bullying and harassment still occur. PFA continues to follow developments through dialogue and company reporting.
Dialogue with Shell in the oil and gas sector:
Active ownership dialogue is a key element in the effort to reduce CO₂e emissions from PFA’s investment portfolio. While PFA does not consider divestment to be a sufficient long-term strategy on its own, it may be applied where, for example, the opportunities for dialogue are assessed to be exhausted and/or the risks associated with the investment are considered too high.
In 2024, PFA decided to divest its investment in the oil and gas company Royal Dutch Shell (Shell). PFA has had a constructive and direct dialogue with Shell since 2019–2020, when we chose to divest our listed investments in a number of oil and gas producers and concentrate our equity exposure in two companies: Shell and TotalEnergies. This was done to strengthen our ability to exert influence as an investor while focusing on companies considered to be most advanced in their transition efforts. PFA continued its dialogue with Shell in 2024, including attending the company’s sustainability strategy day. PFA communicated the need for greater clarity regarding Shell’s future CapEx in low-emission energy solutions, as well as the thresholds applied to limit the climate impact of new oil and gas production. We had expected both elements to be more clearly reflected in the company’s updated transition strategy in the first half of 2024. On this basis, PFA chose to divest from Shell in 2024.
Dialogue on tax practices with pharmaceutical and technology companies:
PFA does not support aggressive tax planning and has worked to improve tax practices among pharmaceutical and technology companies through the thematic engagement programme Taxation 2.0, carried out in collaboration with external advisors and like-minded investors.
The aim of the programme has been to improve transparency among selected companies, including in relation to tax practices, effective tax rates and internal governance. By the end of 2022, companies such as SAP, Biogen and eBay had made the most progress in increasing public disclosures.
Tax practices have received increased international attention, including through the OECD agreement on a 15% minimum tax for multinational companies and the EU directive on country-by-country reporting. In 2023, the programme focused in particular on companies’ lobbying activities in relation to regulatory proposals in Australia. The programme was completed in 2024 and resulted in improvements in transparency and tax governance, including the introduction of tax policies by some companies.
Dialogue on politics within human rights:
PFA has engaged in dialogue with, and/or sent investor letters to, Blackstone, Hiscox, Charles Schwab and Great-West Lifeco regarding the establishment of formal human rights policies following a screening of potential adverse sustainability impacts in 2023. Two of the companies (Hiscox and Charles Schwab) have since established explicit human rights policies.
Dialogue on water supply management:
Water scarcity is a global challenge that requires local solutions. The growing pressure on freshwater resources represents an economic, social and environmental risk worldwide, and poses a significant challenge for many companies.
Through the thematic engagement programme Localized Water Management, PFA has sought to improve water management practices among 18 companies, in collaboration with our external advisor and like-minded investors. The programme, which began in 2020, initially focused on companies operating along the Tietê River in Brazil and the Vaal River in South Africa.
The programme was completed in the first quarter of 2023 and resulted in improvements in companies’ water management practices, including the establishment of water consumption targets, reductions in water use, and the implementation of climate scenario analyses.
Dialogue with Bunge on deforestation:
In the spring of 2022, PFA entered into a dialogue with Bunge regarding the risk of deforestation associated with the company’s sourcing of palm oil and soy in Brazil.
Following in-depth responses from the company outlining its practices to mitigate deforestation risks—including the tracking and monitoring of suppliers and a commitment to deforestation-free supply chains by 2025—the PFA-driven dialogue has, for the time being, been concluded without further action.
However, PFA will continue to monitor Bunge’s development on an ongoing basis in collaboration with our external advisor, who will maintain the dialogue with the company.
Dialogue with Johnson & Johnson on product safety:
In collaboration with our external advisor, PFA has engaged in dialogue with Johnson & Johnson (J&J) on matters related to product safety.
In July 2018, PFA participated in a webinar held by J&J, where the company’s compliance and quality assurance processes were presented, including the introduction of a new, group-wide safety standard.
In November 2019, PFA held a conference call with J&J, where we gained insight into the company’s views on ongoing legal cases concerning talcum powder, opioids and Risperdal.
In April–May 2020, there was further dialogue in connection with COVID-19, where PFA questioned how J&J ensured the continued application of its established R&D protocols despite the speed at which a vaccine was developed.
While the company is still seeking final decisions in several product-related cases, the dialogue is currently considered closed. PFA expects the company to incorporate its experience more systematically into its safety protocols and control procedures, thereby reducing the risk of future product safety cases.
At the same time, it is recommended that the company develops guidelines for increased transparency around product-related data, so that any issues can be communicated to consumers as early as possible.
Dialogue on TCFD reporting with Carrefour and Ahold Delhaize:
Since 2021, PFA has engaged in dialogue with Carrefour and Ahold Delhaize – two of the world’s largest retail companies – on the integration of TCFD recommendations, in collaboration with an external advisor and investors in the Nordic Engagement Cooperation (NEC).
The TCFD (Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures) is an internationally recognized framework for the identification, management and reporting of climate-related risks. PFA encourages the companies we invest in to follow these recommendations, as failure to manage climate-related risks can negatively affect the companies and, ultimately, the value of our investments.
The dialogue with the two companies has now been concluded following improvements in their integration of TCFD recommendations. In addition, both companies have set science-based reduction targets verified by the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi).
Dialogue and investor letters on SBTi and value chain emissions (Climate Plus):
In 2022, PFA sent investor letters to, and/or entered into dialogue with, companies in the PFA Climate Plus equity portfolio that had not yet joined the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi). SBTi is among the most recognized initiatives for the scientific validation of companies’ reduction targets, which makes participation important for PFA’s work to reduce the carbon footprint of our investment portfolio.
At the same time, PFA engaged with companies that had already obtained SBTi validation, with a view to addressing reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across the value chain. As companies’ activities are closely linked to their suppliers and customers, emissions reductions must also consider Scope 3 emissions. It is therefore important for PFA that companies take a holistic approach to their reduction plans.
In total, PFA contacted 40 companies, including through investor letters to 21 companies and dialogue with 19 companies.
Thematic dialogue with leading cocoa and chocolate companies to address child labour:
The thematic engagement programme Child Labour in Cocoa, carried out in collaboration with PFA’s external advisor and like-minded investors, was completed in summer 2022.
The programme focused on addressing child labour in the cocoa sector, particularly in Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana, where it remains a systemic issue.
As part of the programme, PFA and other investors encouraged companies to strengthen supply chain controls through Child Labour Monitoring and Remediation Systems (CLMRS).
Despite a global increase in child labour following the COVID-19 pandemic, six out of seven participating companies have now implemented CLMRS systems covering more than 50% of their supply chains.
Dialogue with Danske Bank on money laundering:
In the period from 2007 to 2015, Danske Bank carried out illegal transactions for customers in its Eastern European branches.
As the case developed, PFA continually requested further information on the bank’s review of earlier high-risk transactions and the allocation of resources to its anti-money laundering efforts. PFA expects the bank to continue its work to improve transparency in this area.
PFA acknowledges that the bank has undergone a transformation process and continues to support its efforts to move in a more responsible direction. We have supported the establishment of a new board of directors to strengthen the bank’s focus on its business and its relationships with investors, customers and society.
In December 2022, Danske Bank agreed to pay a fine of DKK 1 billion to US and Danish authorities. PFA continues to monitor developments but considers the dialogue closed.
Dialogue with TotalEnergies on activities in Russia:
PFA strongly distances itself from the completely unacceptable Russian aggression and war in Ukraine and expects companies in which we have invested to comply with EU sanctions against Russia and Belarus. PFA has been engaged in a critical dialogue with TotalEnergies since it became known in March 2022 that the company conducts activities in Russia through a number of minority stakes in non-state-owned oil and gas companies and that it purchases Russian oil and gas primarily for the European market.
Key developments:
o March 2022: TotalEnergies announced a plan to stop purchasing oil from Russia as quickly as possible, and no later than by the end of 2022, and to gradually suspend its Russian activities. The company notified its intention to stop purchasing oil from the end of 2022 in week 12 of 2022.
o December 2022: The company has stopped purchasing Russian oil and has gradually suspended its Russian activities. TotalEnergies has removed its two representatives from the board of Novatek, Russia’s largest private gas exporter. The company has reduced the value of its 19.4% minority stake in Novatek but does not have the option to divest this holding, as one of Novatek’s major shareholders is subject to Western sanctions.
Dialogue with Freeport-McMoRan on environmental impacts:
PFA has entered into a dialogue with Freeport-McMoRan to gain insight into the company’s practices relating to environmental challenges associated with its mining operations. This includes, among other things, the use of river tailings disposal in Indonesia and issues related to water consumption in Chile. Through this dialogue, PFA seeks to ensure that the company makes sufficient efforts to protect its surroundings and the environment.
Dialogue with TotalEnergies on activities in Myanmar:
PFA has entered into a critical dialogue with TotalEnergies regarding its activities in Myanmar following the removal of the country’s leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, and the democratically elected government by the military junta in a coup in February 2021. PFA distances itself from the military junta and considers the situation in Myanmar to be serious, which is why we sought to understand the rationale and scope of TotalEnergies’ continued presence in the country. In particular, we sought clarification of the relationship with Myanmar Oil & Gas Enterprise (MOGE) and how TotalEnergies managed the risk of indirectly supporting the military regime through its business activities.
The dialogue proceeded as follows:
o In the period from May to December 2021, PFA held several meetings and exchanged correspondence with TotalEnergies, where we requested the company’s assessment and handling of the situation in Myanmar. PFA communicated its concerns and requested responses to a number of questions. TotalEnergies acknowledged the complexity of the situation and indicated that it would seek to address it, including through engagement at board level.
o At the same time, PFA consulted an NGO with expertise in the conflict and assessed the company’s precautionary measures. Based on input from Sustainalytics, PFA considered these measures to be appropriate in the short term, although a prolonged military regime would present challenges for the company’s continued presence.
o In February 2022, one year after the military coup, TotalEnergies’ top management informed PFA that the company would withdraw from its activities in Myanmar due to the unsustainable situation and external expectations. TotalEnergies divested its interests and transferred operations over six months.
o On this basis, PFA considers the dialogue regarding Myanmar to have been concluded. PFA continues to engage with TotalEnergies on the company’s green transition, which we follow closely.
Dialogue with Rio Tinto on violations of indigenous peoples’ rights:
Over time, Rio Tinto has been involved in several cases concerning violations of indigenous peoples’ rights. In 2020, the company was involved in another such case when it destroyed two sacred Aboriginal sites in Australia in connection with the expansion of an iron ore mine. As a result, three members of Rio Tinto’s management team, including the CEO, were dismissed.
The purpose of the dialogue is to ensure that the company compensates the affected community. In addition, Rio Tinto must ensure that its community relations function is fully integrated into its operations, so that operational decisions do not violate the rights of local communities and similar incidents are avoided in the future.
Dialogue with Macquarie on dividend tax fraud:
Since 2018, PFA has been in dialogue with Macquarie following the disclosure of the company’s involvement in dividend tax fraud. PFA continues its critical dialogue with Macquarie on this issue and has decided not to enter into new partnerships with the company until the full facts of the case are clarified.
The outcome of ongoing investigations will be an important factor in determining whether PFA will engage in future business with the company. Among other things, PFA is awaiting the outcome of an ongoing court case in Germany involving Macquarie before reassessing its position. PFA shares this view with both ATP and PKA.
Dialogue with Samsung Electronics on corruption allegations:
PFA’s external asset manager, which holds investments in Samsung Electronics, has been in dialogue with the company’s management regarding concerns about transparency and allegations of corruption. Samsung Electronics has launched initiatives to strengthen its governance, and PFA will continue to monitor developments together with its external asset manager.
Support for CDP’s Science-Based Targets Campaign:
Building on earlier efforts in 2022 and 2023 to promote externally verified emissions reduction targets among listed companies in Climate Plus, PFA has chosen to support CDP’s Science-Based Targets Campaign.
The campaign promotes the adoption of the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi), including through investor letters sent to more than 1,000 companies globally.
Investor letters to US banks on fossil fuel financing:
As a follow-up to voting at the general meetings of six US banks in spring 2022, PFA sent letters outlining our key messages to the banks in question (JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs Group, Wells Fargo & Co., Bank of America and Citigroup) regarding their policies on fossil fuel financing.
PFA did not support the shareholder proposals on fossil fuel financing, as these proposed an immediate phase-out of all financing of the oil and gas sector within the current year. Such a sudden transition could have negative implications for energy security, dependence on Russian energy, and the financial stability of the banks in which pension funds are invested.
While PFA does not seek to impose overly restrictive frameworks on companies through shareholder proposals, we see investor letters as an effective way to communicate our expectations and influence company direction.
Divestment of Anta Sports due to human rights violations:
Anta Sports withdrew from the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI) in order to continue sourcing cotton from Xinjiang in China, despite widespread concerns about human rights violations in the region.
On this basis, PFA contacted the company to seek clarification regarding these issues. Due to the lack of response and the significant sustainability risks associated with the company, PFA chose to divest its investment in Anta Sports in 2022.